Wednesday, January 28, 2009
(0 Comments)
Posted by: Carrie Bakke
By
Claudia Parsons
New York (Reuters) - Most
major U.S. companies have an ethics officer, but as investors survey the
wreckage of a deepening financial crisis that has exposed behavior ranging from
risky to downright illegal, one might ask "What were they doing?"
From
Bernard Madoff's alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme, to the subprime mortgage
crisis, to lavish spending on the chief executive's office at Merrill Lynch,
the past year has seen a crisis of confidence in business that cost investors
$6.9 trillion in U.S. stock market value last year.
"The
rising market covered a lot of sins and a falling market exposes one's
nakedness," said Steve Priest, president of Ethical Leadership Group, a
consulting firm that has worked with 50 of the biggest U.S. companies and firms
in 40 other countries.
"Investors
don't trust the companies they're investing in," he said. "They don't
trust the financial statements, they don't trust the audits, they don't trust
the bond rating agencies."
Lax
lending standards left banks with too many souring loans and insufficient
capital, contributing to the collapse of long-established Wall Street names
like Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and prompting a $700 billion U.S. bank
bailout. Millions of ordinary Americans have seen their retirement savings
hammered and hundreds of thousands have lost jobs.
All
this should inspire companies to embrace the necessity for sound ethical
practices. But experts in business ethics say not all companies have got the
message.
"I
don't think seeing dead bodies in the street always wakes people up," said
Roy Snell, chief executive of the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics,
which has 7,200 individual members who are compliance officers at companies
ranging from small businesses to fast-food giant McDonald's.
"I've
watched this for 13 years. There are always people rationalizing it, saying
'Our people wouldn't do that.'"
Unethical
behavior is ripe for lampooning. A new exhibition of New Yorker magazine
cartoons called "On the Money" features one from 1997 that has a
businessman explaining: "From a purely business viewpoint, taking what
doesn't belong to you is usually the cheapest way to go."
RECESSIONS
RAISE FRAUD RISK
Kerry
Francis, head of corporate investigations at Deloitte Financial Advisory
Services, co-authored a survey this month that showed 63 percent of executives
expect accounting fraud to increase during the next two years because of the
recession.
"I
do believe that fraud is always going to happen," Francis said. "The
human mind has this ability to rationalize away bad acts. It's a sad commentary
on the human being.
"That's
why there have to be controls put in place... You can't have a business with
its leadership saying 'I trust my employees.' You've got to have some kind of
monitoring."
Alex
Brigham, executive director of The Ethisphere Institute think tank, said many
companies paid lip-service to corporate ethics and compliance, maintaining such
departments but sidelining them in major decisions.
Brigham
said that at crippled insurance giant AIG, rescued with $150 billion of U.S.
taxpayer funds after bad mortgage bets nearly bankrupt it, Joseph Cassano, then
head of AIG Financial Products, kicked the company's compliance officer out of
key meetings.
Brigham
last month launched the "Business Ethics Leadership Alliance,"
inviting corporations to commit themselves to a set of ethical standards and
pledge to follow both "the letter and spirit" of the law to curb
illegal behavior.
Companies
that have signed up and will submit themselves to Ethisphere's audit include
PepsiCo Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Dell Inc, General Electric Co and United
Airlines, owned by UAL Corp.
Ethisphere
has ranked major companies on their ethical standards for the past three years,
and Brigham said there was a marked correlation between ones that had a strong
commitment to ethics and transparency, and strong financial results.
PUBLIC
SEES ETHICS DIFFERENTLY
In
the financial sector, he said three victims of the banking blood bath --
Wachovia, Washington Mutual and Countrywide -- received low scores, while
relatively strong survivors, HSBC and Standard Chartered, scored highly on
transparency and ethics.
But
such ethics rankings and prizes are not always reliable. Just three months
before massive fraud was exposed at Satyam Computer Services, an Indian
outsourcing firm whose chairman admitted a $1 billion fraud this month, it
received an award from a group of Indian directors for excellence in corporate
governance.
Priest,
whose firm's parent company Global Compliance operates whistle-blower hotlines
for some 2,500 companies, said there had been a big spike in calls toward the
end of 2008.
Many
companies did little more than "check the boxes" on ethics, he said,
abiding by the letter of the law by publishing codes of conduct, without really
changing the culture of a company or tackling wider ethical issues.
He
said there was a wide gulf between how business defines "ethics and
compliance" and how the public see it.
"Executive
compensation ... sourcing, labor, unions, producing quality products, deceptive
marketing, pricing, packaging -- these are all fundamental concerns of
consumers and the public, but very rarely addressed by ethics and compliance
types," he said.
Priest
said people were always quick to blame greed in every scandal, but "greed
is part of the fuel of the capitalist system. We're never going to see a time
when individuals or businesses all behave ethically and responsibly."
Bill
Lytton, who was hired in 2002 as general council at Tyco International Ltd to
clean up after then-chief executive Dennis Kozlowski and financial chief Mark
Swartz stole more than $150 million from the company, said the key to avoiding
ethical disaster was good leadership by example.
He
recalled that when he worked previously for GE, then-CEO Jack Welch publicly
praised a manager who failed to reach his sales targets because he refused to
pay a bribe to win a contract to build engines for a foreign airline.
"Sometimes
you want to be able to cite a good failure, somebody who didn't make the
numbers, but for all the right reasons," Lytton said.